Model Economics
The economics of machine intelligence.
Price, consumption, market share, and capability across the model economy.
Token Price
Cost of a standardized 1M-token workload
$30.00 per 1M tokens
Observed Token Volume Index
Observed model consumption over time
UTVI · Observed Token Volume Index · updated Oct 29, 2026 · 00:00 UTC · Provisional
33.10T tokens/day +12.4% 1D
Token volume exposed by OpenRouter's rankings-daily dataset for the traffic included by that dataset. Urdais makes no claim about inclusion of BYOK or hidden/private application traffic unless OpenRouter explicitly documents it.
Source: OpenRouter, as of 2026-10-30T02:58:28.000Z. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Methodology UTVI 1.1.0. The source published no data for 2025-06-15 and 2025-07-15; those dates carry no value and none is interpolated.
Model Frontier
Benchmark capability against provider list price per 1M tokens.
45 configurations across 25 models · 3 on the frontier · prices as of 2026-09-22 · scores evaluated 2025-10-16 to 2026-09-22
Model Frontier compares benchmark capability with provider list price per 1M tokens. Reasoning effort may change the number of tokens consumed, so equal unit token prices do not imply equal total cost per request or task.
Not plotted on GPQA Diamond: 280 scored models Urdais has not linked to a priced product, 0 whose identity is ambiguous, and 0 linked models with no comparable standard list price. They are excluded rather than estimated.
Capability: Epoch AI, 'Capabilities & Benchmarking'. Published online at epoch.ai. Retrieved from 'https://epoch.ai/benchmarks' [online resource]. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Price: Urdais Token Price, a 500k input plus 500k output workload weighted evenly. Methodology Model Frontier 1.0.0. A point is one model under one source-declared configuration; capability and price carry different dates and are not reconciled.
Open-weight vs Proprietary
Whether each model's publisher released downloadable weights, measured across observed OpenRouter token volume, Epoch AI benchmark scores, and published list prices.
Volume share
Observed token volume, 30 days to 2026-10-29
- Open-weight(14 models)
- 42.6%
- Proprietary(5 models)
- 2.5%
- Unclassified
- 54.9%
Unclassified is 48.9T in the source’s own residual row, which names no model; 0.0T under aliases and anonymous endpoints that cannot be resolved to the model that served them; 363.9T under identifiers Urdais has not mapped yet; 2.5T whose model is known but whose access is not; and 0.0T whose weights are published for non-commercial use only. It is reported rather than redistributed.
Capability gap
Best-scoring configuration in each class, GPQA Diamond
- Proprietary Gemini 3.7 Flash
- 94.8%
- Open-weight Kimi K3
- 93.1%
- Gap
- 1.7%proprietary leads
Price gap
Median blended list price among Pareto-efficient configurations, GPQA Diamond
- Proprietary (n = 1)
- $0.70
- Open-weight (n = 0)
- —
- Ratio
- Insufficient comparable frontier coverage
Highest-scoring configuration in each class: Gemini 3.7 Flash at $2.25, Kimi K3 at $9.00 per 1M tokens.
Prices as of 2026-09-22
Open-weight means the publisher offers the weights for download under a licence permitting commercial use; it does not mean open source, and several of these licences restrict it. Weights published for non-commercial use only are reported as Unclassified. Volume is share of observed OpenRouter token volume, not of the industry. Prices are published list prices per token, not total inference cost: a model that emits more reasoning tokens to answer the same question costs more than its per-token price suggests.